{"version":"1.0","url":"https://eta.hatenablog.com/entry/2021/08/03/181715","image_url":null,"author_name":"yingtai","html":"<iframe src=\"https://hatenablog-parts.com/embed?url=https%3A%2F%2Feta.hatenablog.com%2Fentry%2F2021%2F08%2F03%2F181715\" title=\"Lee (2005) Epistemology after Protagoras,  Ch.3 \u30d7\u30ed\u30bf\u30b4\u30e9\u30b9\u3068\u76f8\u5bfe\u4e3b\u7fa9 - Quae legeris memento\" class=\"embed-card embed-blogcard\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\" style=\"display: block; width: 100%; height: 190px; max-width: 500px; margin: 10px 0px;\"></iframe>","blog_title":"Quae legeris memento","title":"Lee (2005) Epistemology after Protagoras,  Ch.3 \u30d7\u30ed\u30bf\u30b4\u30e9\u30b9\u3068\u76f8\u5bfe\u4e3b\u7fa9","type":"rich","author_url":"https://blog.hatena.ne.jp/yingtai/","blog_url":"https://eta.hatenablog.com/","provider_url":"https://hatena.blog","published":"2021-08-03 18:17:15","provider_name":"Hatena Blog","width":"100%","description":"Mi-Kyoung Lee (2005) Epistemology after Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus Oxford University Press. Chap.3. Protagoras and relativism. 30-45.","categories":["epistemology","truth"],"height":"190"}