{"html":"<iframe src=\"https://hatenablog-parts.com/embed?url=https%3A%2F%2Ficc-romestatute.hatenadiary.org%2Fentry%2F20050412%2Fp1\" title=\" - \u56fd\u969b\u5211\u4e8b\u88c1\u5224\u6240\u3000\u300c\u624b\u7d9a\u3068\u8a3c\u62e0\u306e\u898f\u5247\u300d\" class=\"embed-card embed-blogcard\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\" style=\"display: block; width: 100%; height: 190px; max-width: 500px; margin: 10px 0px;\"></iframe>","width":"100%","url":"https://icc-romestatute.hatenadiary.org/entry/20050412/p1","description":"\u7b2c\uff15\u7bc0 \u7b2c61\u6761\uff08\u516c\u5224\u524d\u306e\u3001\u8d77\u8a34\u5185\u5bb9\u306e\u78ba\u8a8d\uff09\u306b\u3088\u308b\u3001\u8d77\u8a34\u5185\u5bb9\u306e\u78ba\u8a8d\u306b\u95a2\u3059\u308b\u8a34\u8a1f\u624b\u7d9a\u2015Section V. Proceedings with regard to the confirmation of charges under article 61 \u898f\u5247 125\uff0e \uff08\u8d77\u8a34\u5185\u5bb9\u306e\uff09\u78ba\u8a8d\u306e\u305f\u3081\u306e\u8074\u805e\u3092\u3001\u95a2\u4fc2\u8005\u6b20\u5e2d\u306e\u307e\u307e\u958b\u50ac\u3059\u308b\u6c7a\u5b9a \u2212 Rule 125. Decision to hold the confirmation hearing in the absence of the person concerned \uff11\uff0e \u898f\u5247123\uff08\u78ba\u8a8d\u8074\u805e\u3067\u306e\u95a2\u4fc2\u8005\u306e\u5728\u5e2d\u3092\u78ba\u4fdd\u3059\u308b\u305f\u3081\u306e\u63aa\u7f6e\uff09\u3068\u898f\u5247124\uff08\u78ba\u8a8d\u8074\u2026","version":"1.0","blog_url":"https://icc-romestatute.hatenadiary.org/","published":"2005-04-12 00:00:00","author_url":"https://blog.hatena.ne.jp/ICC_RomeStatute/","image_url":null,"categories":["\u7b2c\uff15\u7ae0\u3000\u635c\u67fb\u3068\u8a34\u8ffd\u2015Chapter 5.\u3000Investigation and prosecution"],"title":"","type":"rich","provider_name":"Hatena Blog","height":"190","provider_url":"https://hatena.blog","blog_title":"\u56fd\u969b\u5211\u4e8b\u88c1\u5224\u6240\u3000\u300c\u624b\u7d9a\u3068\u8a3c\u62e0\u306e\u898f\u5247\u300d","author_name":"ICC_RomeStatute"}