{"type":"rich","url":"https://ita.hatenadiary.jp/entry/20050823/p1","height":"190","author_url":"https://blog.hatena.ne.jp/ita/","categories":["\u306f\u3066\u306a","J"],"provider_name":"Hatena Blog","image_url":null,"width":"100%","description":"\u4eca\u65e5\u306e\u306f\u3066\u306a\u30a2\u30f3\u30c6\u30ca\u306e\u3001\u524d\u91ce\u3055\u3093\u306e\u65e5\u8a18\u306e\u30a8\u30f3\u30c8\u30ea \u301c\u7565\u301c Can someoneexplain why is the spelling \u201dLagrangian\u201d preferred here to\u201dLagrangean\u201d? I would expect the pattern \u201dShakespeare ->Shakespearean\u201d.\u3068\u3042\u308b\u306e\u3092\u898b\u3064\u3051\u305f\u3002Iwould suspect the difference is time period. Shakespeare ->Shakespearean was probably a valid English formation for a si\u2026","blog_title":"ita\u2019s diary","html":"<iframe src=\"https://hatenablog-parts.com/embed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fita.hatenadiary.jp%2Fentry%2F20050823%2Fp1\" title=\" \u30a2\u30f3\u30c6\u30ca\u4e0d\u5177\u5408 - ita\u2019s diary\" class=\"embed-card embed-blogcard\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\" style=\"display: block; width: 100%; height: 190px; max-width: 500px; margin: 10px 0px;\"></iframe>","provider_url":"https://hatena.blog","author_name":"ita","published":"2005-08-23 00:00:00","title":" \u30a2\u30f3\u30c6\u30ca\u4e0d\u5177\u5408","blog_url":"https://ita.hatenadiary.jp/","version":"1.0"}