<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
  <author_name>Hicksian</author_name>
  <author_url>https://blog.hatena.ne.jp/Hicksian/</author_url>
  <blog_title>Irregular Economist 〜hicksianの経済学学習帳〜</blog_title>
  <blog_url>https://hicksian.hatenadiary.org/</blog_url>
  <categories>
    <anon>IS-LM</anon>
  </categories>
  <description>引き続きLaidlerの論文より。Many economists and some philosophers of science share what could legitimately be called Panglossian view of the losses that accompany the move towards more formal models.Kitcher(1993), for example, has argued, in the context of natural science, that although science may drop ideas …</description>
  <height>190</height>
  <html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://hatenablog-parts.com/embed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhicksian.hatenadiary.org%2Fentry%2F20060420%2F1145505508&quot; title=&quot;既得観念としてのIS-LM - Irregular Economist 〜hicksianの経済学学習帳〜&quot; class=&quot;embed-card embed-blogcard&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;display: block; width: 100%; height: 190px; max-width: 500px; margin: 10px 0px;&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <image_url></image_url>
  <provider_name>Hatena Blog</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://hatena.blog</provider_url>
  <published>2006-04-20 12:58:28</published>
  <title>既得観念としてのIS-LM</title>
  <type>rich</type>
  <url>https://hicksian.hatenadiary.org/entry/20060420/1145505508</url>
  <version>1.0</version>
  <width>100%</width>
</oembed>
