<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
  <author_name>himaginary</author_name>
  <author_url>https://blog.hatena.ne.jp/himaginary/</author_url>
  <blog_title>himaginary’s diary</blog_title>
  <blog_url>https://himaginary.hatenablog.com/</blog_url>
  <categories>
    <anon>経済</anon>
  </categories>
  <description>というNBER論文が上がっている（ungated版）。原題は「When Can Benefit Cost Analyses Ignore Secondary Markets?」で、著者はMatthew Kotchen（イェール大）、Arik Levinson（ジョージタウン大）。 以下はその要旨。 We make four main contributions in this paper related to the theory and practice of benefit cost analysis (BCA). First, we show that most BCAs of poli…</description>
  <height>190</height>
  <html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://hatenablog-parts.com/embed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhimaginary.hatenablog.com%2Fentry%2F20220320%2FBCASecondary&quot; title=&quot;費用便益分析はどんな時に2次市場を無視できるのか？ - himaginary’s diary&quot; class=&quot;embed-card embed-blogcard&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;display: block; width: 100%; height: 190px; max-width: 500px; margin: 10px 0px;&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <image_url></image_url>
  <provider_name>Hatena Blog</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://hatena.blog</provider_url>
  <published>2022-03-20 21:16:07</published>
  <title>費用便益分析はどんな時に2次市場を無視できるのか？</title>
  <type>rich</type>
  <url>https://himaginary.hatenablog.com/entry/20220320/BCASecondary</url>
  <version>1.0</version>
  <width>100%</width>
</oembed>
