<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
  <author_name>Kinuko</author_name>
  <author_url>https://blog.hatena.ne.jp/Kinuko/</author_url>
  <blog_title>巡礼者の小道（Pursuing Veritas）</blog_title>
  <blog_url>https://japanesebiblewoman.hatenadiary.com/</blog_url>
  <categories>
    <anon>かしら性について（kephale：headship）</anon>
    <anon>男性リーダーシップの回復</anon>
  </categories>
  <description>出典： Wayne Grudem, &quot;The Meaning of Kephale (“Head”, κεφαλη): A Response to Recent Studies&quot;, in Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, A Response to Evangelical Feminism, Appendix 1 目次 6. Catherine Clark Kroeger, &quot;The Classical Concept of Head as 'Source'&quot; An Important Unanswered Question 7. (1987…</description>
  <height>190</height>
  <html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://hatenablog-parts.com/embed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjapanesebiblewoman.hatenadiary.com%2Fentry%2F2016%2F12%2F27%2F185903&quot; title=&quot;ケファレー（かしら、&amp;quot;head&amp;quot;）をめぐるジェンダー論争―福音主義フェミニズムに対する応答⑤：C・クレーガー、G・フィー両氏の論への反証／&amp;quot;Source”説 徹底検証〔英文〕 - 巡礼者の小道（Pursuing Veritas）&quot; class=&quot;embed-card embed-blogcard&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;display: block; width: 100%; height: 190px; max-width: 500px; margin: 10px 0px;&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <image_url>https://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/K/Kinuko/20161213/20161213000541.png</image_url>
  <provider_name>Hatena Blog</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://hatena.blog</provider_url>
  <published>2016-12-27 18:59:03</published>
  <title>ケファレー（かしら、&quot;head&quot;）をめぐるジェンダー論争―福音主義フェミニズムに対する応答⑤：C・クレーガー、G・フィー両氏の論への反証／&quot;Source”説 徹底検証〔英文〕</title>
  <type>rich</type>
  <url>https://japanesebiblewoman.hatenadiary.com/entry/2016/12/27/185903</url>
  <version>1.0</version>
  <width>100%</width>
</oembed>
