<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
  <author_name>kenhys</author_name>
  <author_url>https://blog.hatena.ne.jp/kenhys/</author_url>
  <blog_title>ひとりしずかに。</blog_title>
  <blog_url>https://kenhys.hatenablog.jp/</blog_url>
  <categories>
    <anon>PlanetDebian</anon>
  </categories>
  <description>This article is cross-posting from grow-your-ideas. This is just an idea. salsa.debian.org The problem According to Developer Machines [1], current buildd machines are like this: armel: 4 buildd (4 for arm64/armhf/armel) armhf: 7 buildd (4 for arm64/armhf/armel and 3 for armhf only) [1] https://db.d…</description>
  <height>190</height>
  <html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://hatenablog-parts.com/embed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkenhys.hatenablog.jp%2Fentry%2F2024%2F03%2F23%2F211515&quot; title=&quot;How about allocating more buildd resource for armel and armhf? - ひとりしずかに。&quot; class=&quot;embed-card embed-blogcard&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;display: block; width: 100%; height: 190px; max-width: 500px; margin: 10px 0px;&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <image_url>https://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/k/kenhys/20240323/20240323211116.png</image_url>
  <provider_name>Hatena Blog</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://hatena.blog</provider_url>
  <published>2024-03-23 21:15:15</published>
  <title>How about allocating more buildd resource for armel and armhf?</title>
  <type>rich</type>
  <url>https://kenhys.hatenablog.jp/entry/2024/03/23/211515</url>
  <version>1.0</version>
  <width>100%</width>
</oembed>
